Previous
Think tanks in Malaysia are no strangers to pressure. Whether working on governance, education, or economic reform, these organisations often operate in sensitive spaces and move between government, civil society and the public. What is changing now is the intensity and nature of that pressure.
The latest 2025 On Think Tanks State of the Sector survey reveals that Malaysian think tanks are striving to grow and remain relevant in a landscape that is becoming increasingly divided and unpredictable. While many are optimistic about the future, the data suggests that the road ahead will not be easy.
Download the On Think Tanks State of the Sector Report 2025
Political division is shaping how think tanks speak
A growing concern among Malaysian think tanks is how to engage in a politically divided environment. More than 60% of Malaysian think-tank respondents said that political polarisation has affected their ability to work. This includes difficulties in engaging with stakeholders across different affiliations, hesitations in releasing findings, and even shifts in how research is presented to the public.
The result is a quieter, more cautious sector. This does not mean organisations are afraid to speak. It means they are carefully weighing how to communicate in ways that remain credible to a broad audience. In times like these, the challenge is not only to publish high-quality research but also to create space for honest and respectful dialogue.
Communication is improving, but trust is still the goal
Nearly all Malaysian think tanks in the survey said they produce content for public audiences. From social media posts to podcasts and public events, the effort to increase accessibility is evident. This is a positive shift. It reflects a growing understanding that research must be shared in ways people can understand and relate to.
At the same time, communication remains one of the top three skill gaps identified by respondents. Many organisations said they want to improve but lack the resources or training to do so. Trust takes more than visibility. It takes consistency, clarity and a willingness to admit what is still uncertain.
At IDEAS, we have made a conscious effort to enhance our communication of complex issues. From infographics and videos to in-person engagements, we have seen how strong storytelling can help bridge gaps and connect people to public policy in a meaningful way.
Think tanks want to grow, but stability is a concern
More than two-thirds of Malaysian think tanks expect to grow in the coming year. They plan to expand their research work, strengthen communications and engage more deeply in policymaking. Some are also exploring artificial intelligence tools to support research and administration.
This energy is promising. But it is difficult to reconcile with the underlying funding picture. A majority of organisations still depend heavily on short-term, project-based funding. Many find it challenging to cover basic operating costs, such as rent, administration, or staff training. And while some reported that their funding had improved slightly, others noted cuts or stagnation.
This raises a tricky question. What does growth mean if stable, flexible resources do not support it? Think tanks do not just need more money. They need the kind of support that allows them to plan ahead, test new ideas and invest in their people.
Diversity policies are taking shape, but are still early
Another shift is happening within organisations themselves. Many Malaysian think tanks said they now have written policies on diversity, particularly around gender, age and ethnicity. These policies are being applied in hiring, project design and communications. Some organisations have already observed a more inclusive culture and a stronger connection with underrepresented groups.
Still, this remains a work in progress. Fewer organisations reported changes in leadership diversity or decision-making structures. In many cases, the policies exist, but the next step is to bring them to life in day-to-day work. That means building staff capacity, encouraging regular feedback, and learning from those who are doing it well.
Independence is holding… for now
Encouragingly, most Malaysian think tanks still feel they have the independence to shape and publish research without external interference. Media receptiveness is moderate but improving. There is also a widespread belief that research continues to hold value in national conversations. But there is no guarantee this will remain the case.
However, this independence cannot be taken for granted. As political and financial pressures increase, credibility must be earned and maintained. This means being transparent about funding, clear about methods, and grounded in evidence. It also means being open to different views without losing focus on the facts.
Looking ahead
Malaysia’s think tanks are not fading. They are adjusting, adapting and accommodating. They are learning to speak more clearly, respond more quickly, and operate in a tougher environment. But adaptation has its limits.
The most useful think tanks are not those with the most polished reports or the most followers online. They are the ones trusted to ask difficult questions, to listen to opposing views and to think beyond short political cycles.
To support this kind of work, we need to see think tanks as more than just research suppliers. They are part of the structure that holds public life together. That means investing in their people, protecting their independence and giving them the space to look ahead when everyone else is focused on the next crisis.
Malaysian research organisations have already shown they can survive change. With the proper support, they can do much more than survive. They can lead.
